TECHNIQUE; SUB-PRINCIPLE: Live Energy and Dead Energy

Blog Article/Post Caveat (Read First Please: Click the Link)

Another misnomer to explain is the sub-principle where one method of explanation might be the difference between a snap punch and a push punch. The snap and push punch are actually one of the examples used to describe this live/dead energy sub-principle. It comes down to a method of energy transference from us to the adversary and can also be expressed as a steady flow of energy over time and distance to a sudden burst of energy in an instance at the target. 

This particular sub-principle is often expressed by karate practitioners, striking arts, as the thrust punch and the snap punch. The argument is about which is best when reality tells us, “it depends.” It depends on the goal when using strikes be they thrust or snap. The Isshinryu system itself differentiates between the two in relation to who is teaching the system. All punches or strikes such as the thrust punch, the push punch and the snap punch have both pros and cons, the choice depends on the gaol. 

Live energy or the snap of a technique as in an instantaneous application of intense force and power is not just about strikes or punches. It also applies to things like restraining techniques or joint manipulations. The end results are compliance or serious injuries. Some tend to recommend that we karate-ka and martial artists snap our weight and mass in all techniques while maintaining control of our energy generation but that is also limiting. As with self-defense, what you apply depends on the situation as that drives your goals. 

Bibliography (Click the link)