The postings on this blog are my interpretation of readings, studies and experiences therefore errors and omissions are mine and mine alone. The content surrounding the extracts of books, see bibliography on this blog site, are also mine and mine alone therefore errors and omissions are also mine and mine alone and therefore why I highly recommended one read, study, research and fact find the material for clarity. My effort here is self-clarity toward a fuller understanding of the subject matter. See the bibliography for information on the books. Please make note that this article/post is my personal analysis of the subject and the information used was chosen or picked by me. It is not an analysis piece because it lacks complete and comprehensive research, it was not adequately and completely investigated and it is not balanced, i.e., it is my personal view without the views of others including subject experts, etc. Look at this as “Infotainment rather then expert research.” This is an opinion/editorial article/post meant to persuade the reader to think, decide and accept or reject my premise. It is an attempt to cause change or reinforce attitudes, beliefs and values as they apply to martial arts and/or self-defense. It is merely a commentary on the subject in the particular article presented.


Note: I will endevor to provide a bibliography and italicize any direct quotes from the materials I use for this blog. If there are mistakes, errors, and/or omissions, I take full responsibility for them as they are mine and mine alone. If you find any mistakes, errors, and/or omissions please comment and let me know along with the correct information and/or sources.


“What you are reading right now is a blog. It’s written and posted by me, because I want to. I get no financial remuneration for writing it. I don’t have to meet anyone’s criteria in order to post it. Not only I don’t have an employer or publisher, but I’m not even constrained by having to please an audience. If people won’t like it, they won’t read it, but I won’t lose anything by it. Provided I don’t break any laws (libel, incitement to violence, etc.), I can post whatever I want. This means that I can write openly and honestly, however controversial my opinions may be. It also means that I could write total bullshit; there is no quality control. I could be biased. I could be insane. I could be trolling. … not all sources are equivalent, and all sources have their pros and cons. These needs to be taken into account when evaluating information, and all information should be evaluated. - God’s Bastard, Sourcing Sources


“All I say is by way of discourse, and nothing by way of advice. I should not speak so boldly if it were my due to be believed.” - Montaigne

What are Fundamental Principles?

The fundamental principles of martial disciplines or karate disciplines or fighting disciplines are those principles underlying all physical activities be they fighting, sport competitions, combatives or self-defense. Principles are those things that make them work regardless of styles or systems. The blog will be about those principles as they apply to my studies, practices and experiences as a karate-ka.


My list of principles as discussed in this blog originate from the fine publication written by Steven J. Pearlman, “The Book of Martial Power.” I have added two new categories, principles, to this list and I have modified his original principles and sub-principles to better suit my perceptions, perspectives and distinctions regarding karate and self-defense. Nothing I have created or changed, none of my perceptions, etc., herein are from Mr. Pearlman, his work was the inspiration toward this end.


I firmly believe principles are the substance that makes karate and martial arts work. In reality, they span all forms of physical activity regardless. My focus with this blog will be karate and self-defense. Take these posts as an academic form of writing and take note of the associated caveat and bibliography that will be present in each post.


Enjoy and don’t hesitate to join the followers and don’t hesitate to make comments, suggestions or present your views in any subject.

PRINCIPLE ONE: PRINCIPLES OF THEORY (Universality, Control, Efficiency, Lengthen Our Line, Percentage Principle, Std of Infinite Measure, Power Paradox, Ratio, Simplicity, Natural Action, Michelangelo Principle, Reciprocity, Opponents as Illusions, Reflexive Action, Training Truth, Imperception and Deception.)


PRINCIPLE TWO: PHYSIOKINETIC PRINCIPLES (Breathing, posture, triangle guard, centerline, primary gate, spinal alignment, axis, minor axis, structure, heaviness, relaxation, wave energy, convergence, centeredness, triangulation point, the dynamic sphere, body-mind, void, centripetal force, centrifugal force, sequential locking and sequential relaxation, peripheral vision, tactile sensitivity, rooting, attack hubs, attack posture, possibly the chemical cocktail, Multiple Methodologies [actual tactics and attack methodologies of impacts, drives (pushes), pulls, twists, takedowns/throws and compression, etc. are best for stopping a threat]???see below)


PRINCIPLE THREE: PRINCIPLES OF TECHNIQUE (techniques vs. technique, equal rights, compliment, economical motion, active movement, positioning, angling, leading control, complex force, indirect pressure, live energy and dead energy, torsion and pinning, speed, timing, rhythm, balance, reactive control, natural and unnatural motion, weak link, non-telegraphing, extension and penetration, Uke. Multiple Methodologies [actual tactics and attack methodologies of impacts, drives (pushes), pulls, twists, takedowns/throws and compression, etc. are best for stopping a threat])


PRINCIPLE FOUR: PRINCIPLES OF PHILOSOPHY (Mind [mind-set, mind-state, etc.], mushin, kime, non-intention, yin-yang, oneness, zanshin and being, non-action, character, the empty cup.)


Principle’s One through Four:

Pearlman, Steven J. "The Book of Martial Power." Overlook Press. N.Y. 2006.


PRINCIPLE FIVE: PRINCIPLES OF SELF-DEFENSE (“Conflict communications; Emotional Intelligence; Lines/square/circle of SD, Three brains (human, monkey, lizard), JAM/AOJ and five stages, Adrenal stress (stress induced reality based), Violence (Social and Asocial), Pre-Attack indicators, Weapons, Predator process and predator resource, Force levels, Repercussions (medical, legal, civil, personal), Go-NoGo, Win-Loss Ratio, etc. (still working on the core sub-principles for this one)”Attitude, Socio-emotional, Diplomacy, Speed [get-er done fast], Redirected aggression, Dual Time Clocks, Awareness, Initiative, Permission, multiple attack/defense methodologies (i.e., actual tactics and attack methodologies of impacts, drives (pushes), pulls, twists, takedowns/throws and compression, etc. are best for stopping a threat)


Principle Five:

MacYoung, Marc. "In the Name of Self-Defense: What It Costs. When It’s Worth It." Marc MacYoung. 2014.

Goleman, Daniel. "Emotional Intelligence: 10th Anniversary Edition [Kindle Edition]." Bantam. January 11, 2012.

Miller, Rory. "ConCom: Conflict Communications A New Paradigm in Conscious Communication." Amazon Digital Services, Inc. 2014.

Miller, Rory and Kane, Lawrence A. "Scaling Force: Dynamic Decision-making under Threat of Violence." YMAA Publisher. New Hampshire. 2012

Miller, Rory. "Force Decisions: A Citizen's Guide." YMAA Publications. NH. 2012.

Miller, Rory Sgt. "Meditations of Violence: A Comparison of Martial Arts Training & Real World Violence" YMAA Publishing. 2008.

Miller, Rory Sgt. "Facing Violence: Preparing for the Unexpected." YMAA Publishing. 2011.

Elgin, Suzette. "The Gentle Art of Verbal Self-Defense" Barnes & Noble. 1993.

Morris, Desmond. “Manwatching: A Field Guide to Human Behavior.” Harry N. Abrams. April 1979.


PRINCIPLE SIX: CHEMICAL COCKTAIL: (Attacked Mind, Train It, Breath It Away, Visualize It Away, Sparring vs. Fighting, Degradation of Technique/skills, Peripheral Vision Loss, Tunnel Vision, Depth Perception Loss/Altered, Auditory Exclusion, Weakened legs/arms, Loss of Extremity Feeling, Loss of Fine Motor Skills, Distorted Memory/perceptions, Tachypsychia (time slows), Freeze, Perception of Slow Motion, Irrelevant Thought Intrusion, Behavioral Looping, Pain Blocked, Male vs. Female Adrenaline Curve, Victim vs. Predator, The Professional, Levels of Hormonal Stimulation, ???)

Search This Blog

Saturday, April 2, 2016

TECHNIQUE; SUB-PRINCIPLE: Kobo Ichi [Koubou ichi 攻防一]

Blog Article/Post Caveat (Read First Please: Click the Link)

Kobo ichi (attack and defense are the same) defines the waza or techniques that comprise many marital arts. As told by martial artist Dave Lowry, “Kobo ichi is a traditional karate blocking where attack and defense are the same. It is the essence of uke waza (blocking techniques) and is in direct contrast to the idea of “one block; two, counter.” It then goes on to inform us by a story about the use of uke waza whereby an adversary is not only blocked from his attack but the results of the block actually destroys the adversary’s balance and that adversary’s ability to continue that attack. Kobo ichi or uke waza are more about the circular application of a technique. It becomes through the atomistic of practice of blocking and countering until they become one, i.e., where the block and counter become one application. It becomes a simultaneous application of technique. 

Note: The above paragraph is the accepted explanation for the concept of kobo-ichi. It is derived from the methods of teaching karate and martial arts but is not as correct today as it was back in earlier history of the discipline. Kobo-ichi is still valid but explaining it today is - different.

Kobo-ichi is still about the concepts of attack and defense being the same but it is not about techniques themselves but about the multiple methodologies used in self-defense, i.e., “Impacts, drives (pushes), pulls, twists, takedowns/throws and compression.” If we apply fundamental principles through the application of multiple defense methodologies then we truly have achieved kobo-ichi, i.e., no attack or defense but a balanced application of methods that achieve the goal of defense. 

As the original author states regarding kobo-ichi: Kobo ichi therefore in the strict and narrow use as a sub-principle is a block that is meant to bring the adversary off balance, it is about simultaneously applying considerable pain and damage, i.e., within the proper level of force allowed, and also pull that adversary into range in the event another counter is required. As can be seen in the following it is alluded to as a separate yet singular application where actually that is simplistic in its presentation. The student must understand that similar to the break down of all principles it is actually the end goal to blend all of them as equally as possible to apply them efficiently and effectively if the physical act is required in any given situation of self-defense.

This particular sub-principles covers defensive and offensive application of methodologies where in actual self-defense it is often not about what defensive or offensive methods is either applicable or appropriate but what goal is appropriate and applicable to each situation, each moment of conflict and/or violence.

It also fails to take into consideration that any defensive strategy must include complete avoidance or at the minimum deescalation goals. In a nutshell the only 100% effective defensive and offensive methodology is the one where you are not there to be involved in either a conflict or a violent encounter or both.

Kobo-ichi is about creating a physiokinetic, physical, answer to the question of when violence is involved. By itself, it promotes the use of the physical when there are other options that must take precedence in conflict and violence. 

The discussion also mentions offensive advantages and defensive advantages where one either or applies either a defense or offense but never mentions when to act and when to not-act and very important when to stop-act, i.e., a go, a no-go and a stop action to remain within the self-defense circle thus avoiding not only the physical but if the physical is not avoided then avoid the ramifications, i.e., legal, civil and psychological/medical. 

It is not actually about being equal offensive and defensive but a balance of all that encompasses either combatives or self-defense. Instead every word, deed or action must achieve the goal of avoidance first, deescalation second or the physical act necessary to stop violence third. Even this is not all inclusive of what one needs to know, understand and apply in self-defense. 


Bibliography (Click the link)

No comments:

Post a Comment